Your profile shows every post you’ve published on Voice. You can also curate posts into a portfolio collection in the admin area then click 'View portfolio’ above to see the portfolio.
I believe that those who value animals as living creatures just like us, will be able to keep that mindset without seeing the pointless slaughter. Also if the artist wanted to make a point, they could do it so the animal still had some dignity after life, although I understand it wouldn't have the same affect
It would be impossible to introduce limits in art without there being claims of oppressing the artists' freedom of speech and opinions. However surely there must be some law opposing the likes of Damien Hirst, murdering animals, such as cows, isn't legal unless you have particular rights and plan to consume them? Where's the innocent expression of opinion requiring you to express it through slaughtering and disassembling a cow's organs?
Comment posted on 25 October 2018
I believe that those who value animals as living creatures just like us, will be able to keep that mindset without seeing the pointless slaughter. Also if the artist wanted to make a point, they could do it so the animal still had some dignity after life, although I understand it wouldn't have the same affect