I’m currently working towards my Gold Arts Award
For the section of developing and sharing a view on an art topic, I have chosen the question “Should there be limits in art?”, for my gold Arts Award. Here is my final argument.
Comment posted on 24 October 2018
Thank you Elizabeth Wright. In this case I personally think Hirst was wrong and I don’t see the purpose of this piece, but do you think it would be ok if the artist used animals to make a point against killing them (one sacrifice to prevent many) or do you think this would just be hypocritical?